By
Emmanuel Legrand
[An edited version of this story was first published in Music Week.]
The
decision from the US National Music Publishers Association to sell
its mechanical rights affiliate Harry
Fox Agency (HFA)
to the Nashville-based, privately-owned performance rights
organisation SESAC
is seen as a game changer in the way publishing rights will be
licensed in future in the US and could also influence future
regulation on PROs.
The
deal, which some sources put at $20 million, will combine the
smallest of the three American PROs, albeit one that is not
constrained by consent decrees, to the largest catalogue of
mechanical rights in the US. What the new joint entity will be able
to do is provide licenses combining performance and mechanical
rights, something the two other PROS, ASCAP and BMI, cannot do.
"This
could be a real game changer," says NMPA former General Counsel
and SVP Jay Rosenthal, now a partner in Washington, DC-based law firm
Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp. "Even though there have been
some limited licensing attempts at bundling performance and
mechanical, and even some sync licensing, in the past, this might
represent the first real modern day attempt in the US to bring some
real efficiency to the music licensing process. It is good for the
market that SESAC is expanding its horizons, and it can be a real
test case. If it can work with SESAC's 10% to 15% of the market why
can't it work with bigger players?"
Rosenthal
adds that another tipping point for the industry is that as SESAC is
unbound by the rules set by the consent decrees affecting ASCAP and
BMI, it does not rely on courts to set the rates, but rather on an
arbitration process. "When you have an arbitration system
setting the rates, it is always always better than the CRB or the
rate courts," says Rosenthal. "All in all, SESAC has some
running room here."
John
Josephson, Chairman and CEO of SESAC, said in a statement that the
transaction was really about providing more licensing opportunities,
in particular through the ability "to make the licensing process
both simpler and more efficient, and in so doing create additional
value for music creators and publishers, as well as the digital music
platforms.”
In
addition, the deal provides SESAC with a database documenting the
catalogues of 48,000 publishers, with metadata on over 6.7 million
compositions and 21.4 million unique master recordings, and access to
HFA’s Slingshot platform. This tool, developed by HFA, provides
royalty tracking, administration and payment services and solutions
to virtually every digital music service of scale in the market
today. This is a business area that SESAC has identified as one in
which it will "invest heavily" in order to create "a
best of breed suite of data and administration services to digital
service providers."
One
insider believes that SESAC's buying into the Slingshot business of
HFA is the best part of the deal. "HFA is good with data and
knows how to calculate royalties on behalf of services and
publishers," says the source. "They go to YouTube and
Spotify and prepare the statements that go to the publishers and the
services. HFA is the best in the business with statements."
NMPS's David Israelite |
NMPA
President & CEO David Israelite declined to comment on the deal,
but sources close to the NMPA suggest that the sale of HFA will also
have an impact on the NMPA. "It takes the pressure off the NMPA
as they won't have to be dealing with HFA's issues any more,"
says a source. In addition, HFA was a main funds for the NMPA, and in
preparation for the disposal of the agency, the NMPA had set up two
years ago new rules by which NMPA members pay a membership fee based
on revenues.
The
other aspect of the deal is whether or not the transaction will
influence the Department of Justice's forthcoming decision on whether
or not modify the consent decrees. One major publisher who did not
wish to speak on the record believes that it will not have any impact
on the DoJ’s review of the consent decrees.
In
a statement, BMI said: “While SESAC is a small competitor, they are
not constrained by an outdated consent decree that limits their
ability to explore new opportunities in the marketplace. Their intent
to purchase the Harry Fox Agency further highlights the need for
consent decree reform, creating a level playing field for all
businesses in this industry. We are encouraged by our ongoing dialog
with the Department of Justice on this and other issues.”
Frank
Liwall, founder and CEO of New York-based The Royalty Network, is not
inclined "to make predictions when it comes to what any
government agency will or won't do," but points out that the
acquisition "certainly creates an uneven playing field for what
we knew as standard PROs. Given that SESAC cannot be all things to
all writers/publishers, I'm sure this will force ASCAP and BMI's hand
at making a strategic move in the near future."
For
David Renzer, CEO of Los Angeles-based Spirit Music Group,
market forces rather than policy-makers are driving the
changes in the US licensing landscape and it has macro- and
micro-economic consequences. "The pressures in the US market are
not unlike those experienced by European collection societies, which
have mechanical, performance and even in some cases sync licensing
housed under one roof," says Renzer.
He
continues, "For Spirit the trend has been to take greater direct
control over our licensing, whether with digital companies -- we
directly license You Tube, and others -- and certainly in the
mechanical licensing area. In the performance rights area, it is
indeed time for changes to the consent decrees and we'll have to stay
tuned for the DOJ 's recommendations. The challenge for all is fairer
compensation to creators while allowing for sustainable business
models to develop and thrive."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.