By Emmanuel Legrand
This is the end of the road for infringing music service Grooveshark.
Parent company Escape Media, which had been found guilty of copyright
infringement by a US court, entered into a consent judgment with a
permanent injunction with Universal Music Group, Sony Music
Entertainment and Warner Music Group.
As
part of a legal settlement with the major record companies, Escape Media has agreed to terminate all operations at the
infringing platform. Escape Media has also agreed to wipe its computer
servers of all the record companies’ music, and surrendering ownership
of its website, mobile apps and intellectual property.
Grooveshark's web site has been shut down and a notice to its users
said: "Dear music fans. Today we are shutting down Grooveshark. We
started out nearly ten years ago with the goal of helping fans share and
discover music. But despite best of intentions, we made very serious
mistakes. We failed to secure licenses from rights holders for the vast
amount of music on the service. That was wrong. We apologize. Without
reservation."
It added, "If you love music and respect the artists, songwriters
and everyone else who makes great music possible, use a licensed service
that compensates artists and other rights holders."
The statement also states that at the time of Grooveshark's launch, in 2006, "few music services provided the experience we wanted to offer and think you deserve." Tech news service Re/code argued instead that Grooveshark was never interested in licensing music
from rights owners: "Contrary to the founders’ statement, paid streaming
services were around for most of the company’s life, though until the
last couple years they weren’t very popular. And Grooveshark wasn’t
interested in a model where it licensed music and charged consumers to
listen to it; instead, the company argued that it was operating
something similar to YouTube, where users uploaded songs to their
servers, without prompting from the company itself, which meant it could
be protected by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act."
Under terms of the
settlement, Grooveshark founders Josh Greenberg and Sam Tarantino admitted
to creating and operating an infringing music service and Escape Media
agreed to significant financial penalties if the terms of the settlement
are not followed. In April, a US District Court judge ruled that Grooveshark could be liable to the maximum damage fine for copyright infringement.
In a statement, the Recording Industry
Association of America (RIAA) said, “This is an important victory for
artists and the entire music industry. For too long, Grooveshark built
its business without properly compensating the artists, songwriters and
everyone else who makes great music possible. This settlement ends a
major source of infringing activity.”
Speaking to Music Week in March, RIAA Chairman and CEO Cary
Sherman, said that record labels always questioned Grooveshark's willingness to secure licensing deals. "I don't have the impression that
they ever were very serious about negotiating deals because our
companies have been interested in monetising streaming services any way
they could, so if they could not come to terms [with Grooveshark] there
is a serious question as to whether they were serious in the first
place," said Sherman, who noted that since the court decision in favour
of record labels the site had experienced "a tremendous fall in
traffic."
I think you'd like cliggo as a groveshark replacement: https://music.cliggo.com
ReplyDelete